Controversy: what possible reforms for ARENH?

I don't know what allows you to affirm peremptorily that nuclear energy is "outdated", whereas the intermittent energies (solar, wind) which are the basis of the electricity production systems promoted by the very people who are the most fervent critics nuclear, were already used by our ancestors several thousand years ago, and whose shortcomings also explain the reasons why they have almost disappeared with the advent of fossil fuels, which are controllable and have the energy density infinitely superior...

Apart from the fact that it is absolutely laughable to qualify nuclear energy as "overpriced", since at €42/MWh the cost of nuclear power is a factor of 5 to 10 times lower than that of a global system based overwhelmingly on intermittent sources and to which would necessarily be added redundant backup means (storage in Step or on battery), which of course the ignorant (or the dishonest) never talk about:

https://jancovici.com/transition-energetique/renouvelables/100-renouvel…

As moreover amply demonstrates two counter-examples such as Denmark and Germany, which after having massively invested in intermittent energies (and although they are still far from being the majority in Germany), see the price of KWh intended for the end consumer almost double that paid by the French!